Friday, February 22, 2008

Thoughts on final project

In general terms, innovations in educational technology are seen as opportunities to transform learning. To my understanding and experience, social software (e.g., wikis, blogs, social bookmarking, amongst others –by no means definitive) is no exception. Many current social software applications include the real social and virtual worlds, as they require both online and offline interactions and verbal/visual connectivity. Let us consider YouTube, SlideFlickr, and SlideShare, as samples, which facilitate the sharing of videos, photos, and PowerPoints respectively with both “real world” and “virtual” friends. On the other hand, social networking sites, such as Friendster, MySpace, and Facebook allow users to build an online identity by customizing their personal profiles with a range of multimedia elements, as well as interacting with existing contacts and establishing new relationships.
The readings so far have elucidated that computer-assisted classroom discussion (CACD) promotes the integrated development of different skills (i.e., writing, reading, listening, speaking) and in terms of second language acquisition (SLA) theory, as well as the use of Internet has provided new opportunities for the teaching of said skills.
For the final project, I am interested in working with weblogs, as a type of content management system, in order to explore the gains in writing skills. Introducing blogging into a Spanish writing class (2008 summer semester, CCCS, Seville, Spain) would be primarily aimed at examining the significance of its use for the process writing approach. This study would consist of three specific aspects of the writing process approach: feedback, editing, and publishing their writings.
I believe that the use of blogs in the writing classroom would create a collaborative learning environment. This would provide a positive framework for developing reading and writing skills. Besides, reading and writing skills are closely associated with motivation. While many students function absolutely well, others, however, struggle. Therefore, the concept of motivation would be worth bearing in mind. In the line of William & Burden (1997), motivation is "a state of cognitive and emotional arousal, which leads to a conscious decision to act, and which causes a period of sustained effort (intellectual, physical, etc.) to attain a previously set goal or goals". Thus, in this case it would be mainly task motivation, since I would do a lot to develop some kind of extrinsic interest in the performance of this specific task. Needless to say, I would take into account those activities that are appropriate to their age and interest. To my impression, students normally consider writing as a chore, which is based on displaying what one knows, so that the teacher can mark the mistakes and give a grade. This motivation could be awaken by CACD.
Writing journals would be an accurate way to improve their skills. These writings would encompass non-fictional (e.g., personal thoughts, real life experiences abroad, cultural shocks, etc.) and fictional (e.g., script writings, short stories, song lyrics, etc.) journals. Since I was a child, I have always heard that “writers learn to write by reading and writing”. This effective power of reading and writing, typically found in the literature “life-transforming ideas have always come to me through books” (bell hooks) or “Esperanza, keep writing. It will keep you free” (Sandra Cisneros), do I believe in. For me writing is an art. This talent can de developed by using different skills, as well as which can be helped by feedback.
In sum, I truly believe that blogs would offer a particular promise for these students, who would play the role of writers, thinkers, and reviewers. Therefore, this research would be conducted in order to determine the effects of the implementation of blogging as a "creative writing activity". In so doing, would blogs increase enjoyment throughout the process? Would blogs enhance creative writing skills?
Questions? Comments? Suggestions? I would really appreciate them!

Friday, February 15, 2008

Thoughts on technology

To be earnest, I had always felt certain reluctance when coming across articles about the impacts of technology in FL. All I used to pay closer attention to was the pedagogic section, rather than the very outcomes of the research. Now, after having discussed some readings about the historical overview of CALL, the current perspectives on technology use, SLA & CALL, I am feeling that this field is quite instructive and promising. As far as I have researched, the connection between Second Language Acquisition theories and the implementation of Internet is being examined from different perspectives, as well as the development of communicative competence between said fields is being explored. This week I presented in class the section on SLA & CALL. Here is the PowerPoint I made and used:



Out of the readings so far, I would like to point out “Processes and Outcomes in Networked Classroom Interaction: Defining the Research Agenda for L2 Computer-Assisted Classroom Discussion” (1997) by Ortega , for presenting in a clear-cut manner the benefits of CACD, what we know about CACD so far, and what we could do with CACD in the future. Focused on the use of synchronous computer-mediated interaction in the second language (L2) classroom, it is stated that "the scope is intentionally limited to research concerned with evaluating the potential benefits of computer-assisted classroom discussion (CACD) in terms of second language acquisition (SLA) theory". Since I was curious, in order to corroborate certain questions from this article, I contacted Ortega and a conversation with her (by the way, she is from my hometown in Spain!) helped me see not only how far we have come in this area, but also how far we still have to go. Also she gave me some reflections about her article "Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication" (in press), which poinpoints the literature review from 1997 to 2007 and its outcomes.
Thus far, I have enjoyed learning about the SlideShare (basic for many, new for me), which is a place to host and share presentations, as well as further functions for blogs. We, as teachers, should take the best advantage of blogging in our classroom, especially in FL classes. By using blogs, we can communicate with students via blogs; blogs can be excellent opportunities for students to practice their reading and writing skills; etc. For further reasons, I invite you to watch "Why Let our Students Blog?" As far as wikis are concerned, I also use them very much. To me, the level of instruction might be one of the inconveniences. However, as far as it is appositely employed, it should not be to worry about. When I use wikis, the main goals for them are posting lesson summaries, collaborative notes, as well as for the threads for discussion boards. Thus far I know that there is some controversy about when and why use blogs vs. wikis, or vice versa. To witness a debate about this , I encourage you to watch Blogs vs. Wikis .
With some readings and looks at diverse articles, I grew some special interest in the use of discussion boards through CourseCompass as CMC in my Spanish classes. I wondered why I would not have used this tool before, if I had always had access to its use. Lack of reliance? At the beginning of every chapter, I invite my students to discuss a thread I post. Needless to say, this line goes with the content we are studying in class and usually touches upon cultural issues. I like the discussion boards because after posting my message, by clicking on their response, we can see what others think on the same subject. Besides, this also allows me to see the views of quieter, more introverted people who don not always speak up in class. In other words, this tool provides students with the chance to say what they want to without being put on the spot in the classroom. With CALL, I believe that there is a raise of language awareness. CALL allows students to see the language being used in more and different settings and, therefore, brings more cultural and authentic language awareness. Besides, students are aware of the nature of their language production. I think that using chat and other CMC activities and micropublishing can allow students to see their language production progress and grow.

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

Presentations for Instruction

Semana Santa

As a tool, I usually make use of PowerPoint presentations to enhance the effectiveness of classroom instruction, specially to introduce culture and make it more approachable. A very common cultural festivity I project in the classroom when time comes up is La Semana Santa in Spain. If interested, have a look at this slideshow.

Although it has been noticed that the PowerPoint is becoming a preferred method of communicating and explaining in our classrooms, there is still an enormous debate on this issue. Pros? Cons? For me, there are more pros than cons, regardless of those commentaries, such as "PowerPoint serves largely the same role in the classroom as pre-processed snack food does in the lunchroom: a conveniently packaged morsel that looks good but doesn't match the intellectual or corporeal nourishment of, say, a critical essay or a plate of steamed spinach" (Joanna Glasner).

I believe that important points can be emphasized and the presentation itself can be enhanced by using graphics, animation, or sound. Thus student interest can be stimulated as well. By a proper use of PowerPoints, lessons tend to be more organized and flexible. If interested in further readings, I have found a related article (i.e., "PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture") which might be of your interest as well.

Saturday, February 2, 2008

After using Internet for 5 days !

Monday, January 28th
5.00 – 8.00 PM: TIFLE Class (e.g.: class management, review of Discussion Board Activities, chatting on-line with AOL with my TIFLEmates from SC, creating “Exploring TIFLE” Blog);
11.00 – 11.15 PM: check email from UF Webmail account (received 1 message from a classmate; sent 1 message); Gmail account (received 1 message from a friend; sent 1 message).
Total: 3 hours and 15 minutes (180 mins. work/ 15 mins. personal)

Tuesday, January 29th
8.00 – 8.50 AM: read the daily newspaper El País ;
9.15 – 9.40 AM: check email from UF Webmail account (received 8 messages: 2 from the RLL department, 1 from a student, 1 from a classmate, 1 from the Online Journal, Sin Frontera, 3 from listservs (Rediris , Dialnet, and ConferenceAlerts); sent 3 messages); Gmail account (received 4 messages: 3 from junk mail (AT&T, Virgin Atlantic, and Travelocity) and 1 from a family member; Sent 1 message);
3.00 – 3.40 PM: talking with a family member and chatting with a friend simultaneously with Skype;
7.00 – 8.10 PM: class management (BlackBoard for SPN2200 for updating gradebook; WebCT for FRE6900 for handouts for next class); Web browsing; purchase of a novel for FRE6900 @ Half Price; listing to my playlist of favorites @ YouTube simultaneously.
9.30 – 9.50 PM: check email from UF Webmail account (received 3 messages: 1 from the RLL department, 1 from a professor of the LIN department with information regarding the upcoming AAAL 2008 Annual Conference, 1 from student; sent 2 messages) and Gmail account (received 3 messages: 2 from the junk mail (Spanair, Wachovia) and 1 from a family member; Sent 1 message);
11.00 – 12.15 PM: watch the final of the Cádiz Carnival festival @ YouTube (for cultural tradition and entertainment).
Total: 4 hours and 40 minutes (70 mins. work/ 210 mins. personal)

Wednesday, January 30th
7.50 – 8.40 AM: read the daily newspaper El País;
8.40 – 8.50 AM: check email from UF Webmail account (received 8 messages: 3 from the RLL department, 1 from UF Financial Services, 1 from a student, 3 from listservs (Cervantes Virtual; Semainein , and Casa del libro; sent 2 messages); Gmail account (received 7 messages: 5 from junk mail (JetBlue, GRU, Dell, Wachovia, and Apple), 1 from a family member and 1 from a friend; sent 1 message);
6.00 – 6.20 PM: class management (BlackBoard for SPN2200 for updating gradebook and posting PowerPoint presentations for next class);
8.30 – 8.45 PM: purchase of a present for a family member @ Amazon;
11.00 – 11.25 PM: check email from UF Webmail account (received 2 messages: 1 from a classmate and 1 from student; sent 2 messages); Gmail account (received 0 messages).
Total: 2 hours (20 mins. work/ 105 mins. personal)

Thursday, January 31st
8.00 – 8.50 AM: read the daily newspaper El País;
9.30 – 10.00 AM: check email from UF Webmail account (received 6 messages: 3 from the RLL department, 1 from a student, 2 from listservs (Portal del Hispanismo, and Jóvenes Linguistas; Sent 2 messages); Gmail account (received 4 messages: 2 from junk mail (CraigsLists, and Travelocity), 1 from a family member and 1 from a friend; sent 0 message);
12.00 – 1.00 PM: a conversation with a former professor with skype;
3.00 – 3.30 PM: class management (BlackBoard for SPN2200 for gradebook updates; WebCT for FRE6900 for handouts for next class);
6.15 – 9.00 PM: class management (using an online dictionary and grammar while working on a French project for FRE6900);
10.00 – 10.20 PM: check email from UF Webmail account (received 3 messages: 1 from the LIN department, 1 from listserv (LLJournal), and 1 from a student; sent 1 message) and Gmail account (received 4 messages: 3 from junk mail (El Corte Inglés, Bank of America, Telefónica) and 1 from a friend (sharing a video from YouTube); sent 1 message);
11.30 – 12.15 PM: watch TV news @ RTVE.
Total: 6 hours and 40 minutes (195 mins. work/ 205 mins. personal)

Friday, February 1st
8.00 – 8.35 AM: read the daily newspaper El País;
8.35 – 9.00 AM: check email from UF Webmail account (received 7 messages: 1 from the RLL department, 1 from UF Library, 1 from a student, 4 from listservs (Junta de Andalucía , SAGA, UF CES, and AESLA; sent 1 message); Gmail account (received 3 messages: 1 from junk mail (AT&T), 1 from former professor from USE , and 1 from University of Cambridge with the results of the CPE taken last December 2007 ; sent 1 message);
3.00 – 3.15 PM: class management (posting PowerPoint presentations on BlackBoard for SPN2200 for next week);
5.00 – 6.30 PM: class management (Web browsing for a research of LIN7725 :UF library catalog search, Instituto Cervantes search, and Google Book search)
9.00 – 9.50 PM: class management (FOL 6326 : reading the instructions of the assignment to post in detail, editing my blog, and printing the articles for next class);
11.00 – 11.10 PM: check email from UF Webmail account (received 1 message from a student; sent 1 message); Gmail account (received 0 messages).
Total: 3 hours and 45 minutes (155 mins. work/ 70 mins. personal)


On looking over my log, it is noticeable that I use Internet primarily for personal (e.g.: emails, news, television, and music, etc.) and professional (e.g.: emails, research, class management, etc.) purposes. If I should emphasize and choose one per each use, news from El País would be for personal reason, whereas emails (67 received items; 19 sent items), would be for work purposes. While the former one helps me be in touch with the social, political, and cultural situation of my country (as well as an international overview), the latter one, on the other hand, is highly important for me to contact professors, students, and classmates.

Overall, on noting the length of time I have spent actively online, doubtless I am dependent on Internet for every day functions in my professional and personal life. However, based on my log, I feel reluctant to characterize myself as a user strictly in these domains. In other words, in taking these 5 days at random, I believe that this does not necessarily correspond to the actual use of Internet in my real life. Different variables, such as periods of weekends, final exams, vacations, amongst others, would be taken into account for a more meticulous assumption. If special occasions had been considered, this analysis could have been different.

About me

Hi all,
My name is Francisco Salgado-Robles and I am a second-year PhD student in the program of Hispanic Linguistics at the University of Florida. About me, let me tell you that I was born in Sanlúcar de Barrameda in the province of Cádiz (Andalucía, Spain) –a very well-known city for its beautiful beach, its original wine called Manzanilla, its tasty shrimps, its charming people, and its nice weather.
Since I was in high school, I became passionate in the field of education, especially to the literature and language areas. In 2004 I graduated in English Linguistics and Literatures from the University of Seville, Seville. Encouraged by some professors to study overseas and explore the passion of my field (issues in bilingualism), I was granted a scholarship for my graduate studies at the University of Missouri. Upon the completion of my master’s degree in 2006, I applied for doctoral studies at the University of Florida. Since then, I have been working primarily in second language acquisition (under the supervision of Dr. Gillian Lord) and language variation and change (under the supervision of Dr. Jessi Aaron).
As to my work experience during my undergraduate studies, I tutored in Spanish to exchange students from the US for CIEE (Council on International Educational Exchange) Program at the Applied Language Institute. Besides, for my last two years (2002 – 2004) in Seville, I was the program assistant (under the direction of Dr. Jane Arnold) in the Department of English Linguistics. In the University of Missouri, I also received a lecturer position to teach intermediate Spanish at the Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures. Since last fall 2006, I have been working as a teaching assistant in Spanish at the Department of Romance Languages and Literatures in the University of Florida. Additionally, I teach Spanish during summer semesters in the Study Abroad Program CCCS (The Center for Cross-Cultural Study), Seville, Spain. Currently I am teaching Spanish at the intermediate level under the direction of Dr. Gillian Lord.
Apart from the academic and professional facets, for 3 years now I have been sharing my life with a bright, adoring, and marvellous person: Carmen. Above all, she represents my muse in the entire sense of my life and is, as her name signifies, the recreation of a poem. Together we spend our time jogging, listening to rock and pop music, as well as that of particular singer-songwriters, watching European films, reading literature (especially, that flourished as a linguistic, social or political commitment), cooking Spanish cuisine, and working towards our doctoral studies at the University of Florida.